15.11.2017

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

The next FounderTalks.org event will take place in Vienna on February 16th, 2018. We talked to founder and organizer, Audrey Kim, about her mission and how everything started.
/artikel/foundertalks-org-a-private-session-with-silicon-valley-founders-in-vienna
(c) Audrey Kim
kooperation

Der Brutkasten is not going to report on what happens at the upcoming FounderTalks.org event taking place in Vienna on February 16th, 2018. The reason being that everything that happens at this annual invite-only event is off-the-record. Startup founders, investors and corporate innovation managers must be invited to this private event with a very focused approach. Though the event itself is discerningly small, there is nothing small about its program and impact. The founders of WordPress, Google Analytics and Reddit were present in past years, and are just a few names among the all keynote-level speakers/mentors whose individual companies average valuations, exits or IPOs above one billion US-Dollars.

FounderTalks.org is already accepting applications for the upcoming event. The invitations are given on a rolling basis and the event is limited to 100 participants in order to keep the small mentoring session ratio. The event focuses on curated advice, exclusive content, personal relations and networking. Open applications are accepted from founders, investors, accelerator/innovation leaders, and those interested in entrepreneurship (85 percent of the invitations are reserved for startup founders. The rest goes to investors, innovation managers, corporates and accelerators).

FounderTalks.org started in 2014 in Vienna by Audrey Kim (formerly YCombinator, Google, United Nations, Cruise Automation), Andreas Klinger (Co-Founder diesocialisten.at, now Product Hunt) and Michael Ströck (Co.Founder Kochabo.at and Gustav). Der Brutkasten talked to founder Audrey Kim about the idea behind FounderTalks.org and her vision for the future.

⇒ Apply for the event here


How did you come up with the idea of FounderTalks.org? How did everything start?

After working for YCombinator in 2012, several conferences, accelerators and government organizations developing startup initiatives around Europe and Asia began asking me to help them source speakers from Silicon Valley for their events. It was a lot of fun to fly around to all the different countries and organize the spectacular events, but once I settled back in Vienna (where I have been living part-time since 2009) I wanted to create something optimized for bridging my two homes, San Francisco and Vienna in a personalized and sustainable way.

I’m not a particular expert in any tech field, but because I’ve spent so much time working in different tech industries and cities, I’m often making 1:1 introductions between people working on interesting things who could mutually benefit from knowing each other. FounderTalks.org was a way to scale this by bringing together a curated group of great people at once and creating a platform for candid conversations (events are off-the-record) and personal connections (mentor sessions and reception). The goal was to foster a community of entrepreneurial-minded people who would want to help each other out.

+++ Interview: In diese Startups investiert Wesley Chan von Google Analytics +++

That sound like a lot of work for a good cause. Where did you take your motivation from?

My original motivation for creating FounderTalks.org was two part. First, I selfishly wanted to get my friends from the US, many of whom are founders and investors, to visit Vienna more regularly while I was here. The best way to do that seemed to be to get them to invest in Vienna and to make them fall in love with the city as much as I have.

By making FounderTalks.org invite-only and curating for high-calibre and high-potential founder attendees, we offer good dealflow for investments, and create an event where the speakers and mentors themselves are excited to get to know the attendees and engaged with the interesting things they are working on. Many of our past speakers and mentors have stayed in touch and invested in the founder attendees. Additionally, the reason FounderTalks.org is always organized around a Viennese Ball is because we take the speakers to one after the event so they get to experience this enchanting bit of uniquely Viennese culture. I also arrange Viennese Waltzing lessons before so Vienna is adding a bit of culture and fun to the Silicon Valley. Maybe we’ll eventually be able to have Ball Season in San Francisco, too!

Second, I love Vienna, and not only do I think it’s the most beautiful city in the world, I believe Austria has a lot to offer the world with its illustrious culture, great infrastructure and diversity of talented people. It has great potential to become a center for innovation and already is one for culture.

“I don’t think Austria should try to make Vienna “the next Silicon Valley”. The Silicon Valley is the best Silicon Valley because it is itself.”

 width=
(c) foundertalks.org: Impression from a previous event.

So could Vienna become the European or at least the CEE-Silicon Valley?

I don’t think Austria should try to make Vienna “the next Silicon Valley” as many cities are aspiring to be. The Silicon Valley is the best Silicon Valley because it is itself, which includes its unique history, location and inertia which is not duplicable. Rather, I think Austria’s impact will be stronger by identifying its natural, unique strengths, and taking into account what levers it can effectively pull to optimize for a fecund environment of innovation and industry that might look very different from what Silicon Valley is today, but be just as powerful in its own way.

As Andi (Klinger) said, a big impediment for startups in Europe is that it is difficult to scale outside of one’s own country as there is a lot of overhead to expanding country by country with different languages, laws, and geographies. I agree with Andi that making it easier for startups to scale and work at a European level will be beneficial, especially for founders with B2C business models for whom scaling by people is important.

Also, I see that aside from traditional B2C and B2B business models, there is a lot of opportunity now for earlier tech heavy development that are more culturally agnostic. For example, self-driving cars, artificial intelligence, machine learning, AR/VR, in addition to the supporting hardware (like GPUs and Lidars).

I can’t speak to the ins-and-outs of growing a startup from scratch since I’ve not founded one myself — my expertise and what I enjoy doing is in cross-cultural community growth and development, scaling, business analysis and event planning from my experience with Google, the United Nations, YCombinator and Cruise Automation.

To those points, Austria not only has great universities and resources for research and development, Vienna is uniquely a geographical nexus point between Western and Eastern Europe. Also, over 70 percent of the country speaks English, so there is a higher probability that there will be a denominating language between all the best people around the world to work together. This means that there are fewer barriers to both having experts in tech heavy ventures from all over the world come together in Austria, and for Austrian based companies to scale globally (since English is currently the lingua franca).

When did you first meet Michael and Andreas and why did you decide to do FounderTalks.org together?

I think I originally got connected to Andi from a mutual acquaintance because we each wanted to learn from the other more about the Austrian and SV startup ecosystem. As for Michi, I got a hold of his number somehow and cold-called him to ask for free food from Ströck-Brot for a FounderTalks.org pilot event to keep costs down. He said no for that event, but now if you come to FounderTalks.org events, you get delicious Ströck food! I immediately liked Andi and Michi when I first met them. I think it was mutual? (laughs) And we quickly became friends and have now been for five years. We also had a shared belief in the importance of building a community for our vision of an ideal startup ecosystem, so when I proposed the initial idea of FounderTalks.org they helped to refine the concept with their expertise and insights. And then we just started organizing it. I don’t think we realized going into it how much work it would be. We joke now that FounderTalks.org started as a very expensive and time-consuming hobby.

After the first years of FounderTalks.org: What were your biggest learnings so far? Did you change your approach or your philosophy since the beginning?

FounderTalks.org is organized in three parts: Talks/Q&A, Small Group Mentor Sessions and Social Reception. The Talks/Q&A are off-the-record to enable candidness and insights not usually shared in highly publicized events. For the Mentor Sessions, our speakers break out into small groups with the attendees in ratios of 1:10 to talk more in-depth about the individual’s needs. And so folks can get to know each other personally. We pair attendees with the mentor who seems most suited or has aligned knowledge for what they’re working on. At the Reception, all our Speakers/Mentors are out and about eating and drinking with the attendees, so everyone can have the opportunity to connect with all speakers even if they weren’t paired with them as mentors. It’s also a great setting and for all our invited guests to connect with each other. We limit the number of invited guests to 70-100 in order to maintain low ratios for Mentor Sessions and to promote community building at the Social Receptions.

We got so much positive feedback after the first event about how valuable and special the Mentor Sessions were that we doubled the number of Mentor Sessions in the last two events. Now for our 4th event, we will host two break-out groups so attendees meet with two different Speaker and Mentors at the event. Attendees also expressed that they gained a lot of value from the unique content of the talks, which I think is due to the speakers knowing what they say is off-the-record, and because they are speaking to an invite-only audience so we will continue to keep the events small and well curated.

+++ Edward Kim von Gusto im Interview: “Scheitern war nicht erlaubt” +++

What are your future plans?

I think we’ve created something really special and powerful. A lot of that potency comes from the curation and small, private nature of the event. So the core FounderTalks.org event will remain founder-focused, off-the-record, and invite-only small batches in Austria.

I also see potential to impact the ecosystem and aid innovation by building more integration between founders, investors, corporations and government agencies both across Europe and the US. I plan to grow the program to liaise between and be optimized for what each of these pieces of the ecosystem needs. I’m not sure yet what the most impactful form or arrangement will be, but it could be in the form of spin-off corporate and government events, and hopefully events in the Silicon Valley forAustrian-based companies an organizations. Right now I’m taking time to meet with these different players to learn more about them and am thinking about how we can best build a stronger community together. Basically though, I believe helping to make experts from different worlds curious about and respect each other, then allowing a safe space for them to talk and get to know each other is a winning formula for innovation and creation.

Recently there were more and more comments predicting the end of the startup era (at least in Silicon Valley). What is your opinion on that?

The people saying those things are probably not going to be the ones creating the next big startups.


⇒ Apply for the event here

Deine ungelesenen Artikel:
17.12.2024

Austrian AI Landscape 2024: Heuer 70 neue Unternehmen

Die Austrian AI Landscape ist wieder da. Diesmal mit 70 neuen Einträgen. Clemens Wasner von EnliteAI erklärt die Gründe für die Steigerung, gibt Prognosen ab und zählt auf, was der heimische KI-Standort künftig benötigt.
/artikel/austrian-ai-landscape-2024-heuer-70-neue-unternehmen
17.12.2024

Austrian AI Landscape 2024: Heuer 70 neue Unternehmen

Die Austrian AI Landscape ist wieder da. Diesmal mit 70 neuen Einträgen. Clemens Wasner von EnliteAI erklärt die Gründe für die Steigerung, gibt Prognosen ab und zählt auf, was der heimische KI-Standort künftig benötigt.
/artikel/austrian-ai-landscape-2024-heuer-70-neue-unternehmen
AI Landscape 2024, Wasner, Hochreiter
(c) Stock.Adobe/GamePixel - Die AI Landscape 2024 ist da.

Die Austrian AI Landscape von Clemens Wasner (EnliteAI, AI Austria) zeigt AI-Startups und -Unternehmen aus der heimischen Startup-Szene. Das Branding dazu wurde von Andreas M. Keck, Kopf und Gründer von “beamr. brand consulting studio” pro-bono durchgeführt. Es ist bereits die insgesamt achte Ausgabe der österreichischen KI-Landschaft.

AI Landscape 2024 wird größer als ihre Vorgänger

“Heuer gibt es 70 neue Unternehmen, ein Novum in dieser Größenordnung. Es ist ein internationales Phänomen, denn die Eintrittsbarriere für die Gründung eines KI-Unternehmens ist gesunken. Ein Grund ist, dass viele Basistechnologien als ‘open source’ verfügbar sind und nicht mehr von Grund auf selbst entwickelt werden müssen”, erklärt Wasner die gestiegene Anzahl an KI-Unternehmen in Österreich.

Besonders im Bereich “Corporate Early Adopters” zeigt sich eine starke Steigerung. “Unternehmen, die teilweise 100 Jahre alt sind, haben eigene AI-Business-Units aufgebaut, eigene Teams zusammengestellt und sind Joint Ventures eingegangen. AI ist schlussendlich in der Realwirtschaft angekommen”, so der AI-Experte weiter.

Die AI Landscape Austria 2024

(c) EnliteAI, AI Austria, Andreas M. Keck (beamr) – Die gesamte Austrian AI Landscape.

Cybersecurity-Bereich steigt

Allgemein ist festzustellen, dass sich – entgegen der letzten Jahre – mehr Firmen mit “Cybersecurity & Defence” beschäftigen. Die Gründe dafür sind, dass es einerseits, wie erwähnt, mehr Open-Source-Modelle gibt, auf die man zurückgreifen kann, ohne selbst Basis-Modelle entwickeln zu müssen. Andererseits hat der Ukraine-Krieg ein Bewusstsein für diese Branche geschaffen.

Die EU hat etwa am 15. März 2024 das Arbeitsprogramm für den European Defence Fund veröffentlicht. Die offizielle Ausschreibung wurde am 20. Juni geöffnet, eine Einreichung war bis zum 5. November 2024 möglich. Diese Ausschreibung war mit 1,1 Milliarden Euro dotiert, wovon 40 Millionen Euro für disruptive Technologien und 67 Millionen Euro für KMU vorgesehen sind.

AI Landscape: GenAI als Treiber

Einen anderen Faktor für die Steigerung der Anzahl an KI-Firmen in Österreich sieht Wasner darin, dass viele Unternehmen in der Vergangenheit auf Automatisierung gesetzt hätten. Belege erkennen, den E-Mail-Posteingang lesen und ins CRM schieben – das sei mit der eigenen Technologie natürlich limitiert gewesen, durch Generative AI und LLMs (Large Language Models) wären nun sehr viele in diesem Bereich tätig. “Das ist etwas, das weltweit parallel passiert”, so Wasner. “Und Chatbots oder Dashboards beinhaltet.”

Auch bemerkenswert ist, dass im Bereich “Life Science” mittlerweile 30 Unternehmen aus Österreich vertreten sind. Für den KI-Experten “wenig verwunderlich”, da es hierzulande mit LISAvienna, INITS und mit dem Science Park Graz gleich drei Ökosysteme gibt, die in diesem Feld “Firmen produzieren”.

Zudem ist der Proptech-Bereich auffällig stark geworden, was wiederum an der Nutzung von LLMs liegt, zum Beispiel wenn es um die Auswertung von Dokumenten rund um Bauprojekte geht. Überall dort, wo man auf unstrukturierte Daten treffe – Baupläne, etc. – sei nun GenAI vermehrt einsatzbar und das ganze Proptech-Feld gehe “durch die Decke”. Insgesamt, so Wasner, gebe es heuer einfach mehrere große Themenfelder in der heimischen AI Landscape.

Beachtlich sei zudem, dass in der KI-Branche wenig Firmen pleite gegangen sind. “Dieses Jahr habe ich im Vergleich zum Vorjahr nur drei, vier Firmen herunternehmen müssen”, sagt er. “Davor waren es rund 30.”

Doch der KI-Experte warnt vor zu großer Euphorie. Er sieht den Moment jetzt als “Ruhe vor dem Sturm” und erwartet eine Konsolidierungswelle für das kommende Jahr. In diesem Sinne prognostiziert er einen Akquise-Trend, der uns bevorsteht. Größere Firmen würden, so seine Einschätzung, Unternehmen aus der Sparte “Operations & Search” aufkaufen, weil sich deren Angebot als replizierbares Business für Dienstleister auszeichne (Knowledge-Management, Bots, Suche mit LLMs).

Mehr Deregulierung, aber…

Was den europäischen Standort betrifft, wünscht sich Wasner mehr Deregulierung, allerdings nicht unbedingt auf der KI-Seite, wie er sagt. Europas KI-Problem liege vor allem im Umstand begründet, dass es hier schwieriger sei, zu gründen bzw. etwa Mitarbeiterbeteiligungen schwerer zu implementieren wären. “In Europa gibt es 27 Rechtsformen bei der Unternehmensgründung, das ist einfach nicht ‘investible'”, sagt er. Auch seien die Finanzierungen zu gering, vor allem dann, wenn man eine KI-Foundation baue. Mistral aus Frankreich wäre da der einzige Ausreißer, was europäische Top-KI-Firmen betreffe.

Als zweiten Punkt nennt Wasner, dass sich die “Compute-Infrastruktur” als zu klein für den europäischen Raum zeige und es von der EU-Seite Investitionen von mindestens 20 Milliarden Euro – wenn nicht mehr – bräuchte, um im KI-Konzert der Großen eine Chance zu haben. Der dritte und letzte Faktor, den Wasner in Sachen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit erwähnt, ist, auf “skilled immigration” zu setzen, um die besten Talente ins Land zu holen, wie er sagt: “Das allerdings geht nur, wenn man die ersten beiden Punkte löst.”

Toll dass du so interessiert bist!
Hinterlasse uns bitte ein Feedback über den Button am linken Bildschirmrand.
Und klicke hier um die ganze Welt von der brutkasten zu entdecken.

brutkasten Newsletter

Aktuelle Nachrichten zu Startups, den neuesten Innovationen und politischen Entscheidungen zur Digitalisierung direkt in dein Postfach. Wähle aus unserer breiten Palette an Newslettern den passenden für dich.

Montag, Mittwoch und Freitag

AI Summaries

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Welche gesellschaftspolitischen Auswirkungen hat der Inhalt dieses Artikels?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Welche wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen hat der Inhalt dieses Artikels?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Welche Relevanz hat der Inhalt dieses Artikels für mich als Innovationsmanager:in?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Welche Relevanz hat der Inhalt dieses Artikels für mich als Investor:in?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Welche Relevanz hat der Inhalt dieses Artikels für mich als Politiker:in?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Was könnte das Bigger Picture von den Inhalten dieses Artikels sein?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Wer sind die relevantesten Personen in diesem Artikel?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

AI Kontextualisierung

Wer sind die relevantesten Organisationen in diesem Artikel?

Leider hat die AI für diese Frage in diesem Artikel keine Antwort …

FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna