FounderTalks.org: A private session with Silicon Valley founders in Vienna

✨ AI Kontextualisierung

Der Brutkasten is not going to report on what happens at the upcoming FounderTalks.org event taking place in Vienna on February 16th, 2018. The reason being that everything that happens at this annual invite-only event is off-the-record. Startup founders, investors and corporate innovation managers must be invited to this private event with a very focused approach. Though the event itself is discerningly small, there is nothing small about its program and impact. The founders of WordPress, Google Analytics and Reddit were present in past years, and are just a few names among the all keynote-level speakers/mentors whose individual companies average valuations, exits or IPOs above one billion US-Dollars.

FounderTalks.org is already accepting applications for the upcoming event. The invitations are given on a rolling basis and the event is limited to 100 participants in order to keep the small mentoring session ratio. The event focuses on curated advice, exclusive content, personal relations and networking. Open applications are accepted from founders, investors, accelerator/innovation leaders, and those interested in entrepreneurship (85 percent of the invitations are reserved for startup founders. The rest goes to investors, innovation managers, corporates and accelerators).

FounderTalks.org started in 2014 in Vienna by Audrey Kim (formerly YCombinator, Google, United Nations, Cruise Automation), Andreas Klinger (Co-Founder diesocialisten.at, now Product Hunt) and Michael Ströck (Co.Founder Kochabo.at and Gustav). Der Brutkasten talked to founder Audrey Kim about the idea behind FounderTalks.org and her vision for the future.

⇒ Apply for the event here

How did you come up with the idea of FounderTalks.org? How did everything start?

After working for YCombinator in 2012, several conferences, accelerators and government organizations developing startup initiatives around Europe and Asia began asking me to help them source speakers from Silicon Valley for their events. It was a lot of fun to fly around to all the different countries and organize the spectacular events, but once I settled back in Vienna (where I have been living part-time since 2009) I wanted to create something optimized for bridging my two homes, San Francisco and Vienna in a personalized and sustainable way.

I’m not a particular expert in any tech field, but because I’ve spent so much time working in different tech industries and cities, I’m often making 1:1 introductions between people working on interesting things who could mutually benefit from knowing each other. FounderTalks.org was a way to scale this by bringing together a curated group of great people at once and creating a platform for candid conversations (events are off-the-record) and personal connections (mentor sessions and reception). The goal was to foster a community of entrepreneurial-minded people who would want to help each other out.

+++ Interview: In diese Startups investiert Wesley Chan von Google Analytics +++

That sound like a lot of work for a good cause. Where did you take your motivation from?

My original motivation for creating FounderTalks.org was two part. First, I selfishly wanted to get my friends from the US, many of whom are founders and investors, to visit Vienna more regularly while I was here. The best way to do that seemed to be to get them to invest in Vienna and to make them fall in love with the city as much as I have.

By making FounderTalks.org invite-only and curating for high-calibre and high-potential founder attendees, we offer good dealflow for investments, and create an event where the speakers and mentors themselves are excited to get to know the attendees and engaged with the interesting things they are working on. Many of our past speakers and mentors have stayed in touch and invested in the founder attendees. Additionally, the reason FounderTalks.org is always organized around a Viennese Ball is because we take the speakers to one after the event so they get to experience this enchanting bit of uniquely Viennese culture. I also arrange Viennese Waltzing lessons before so Vienna is adding a bit of culture and fun to the Silicon Valley. Maybe we’ll eventually be able to have Ball Season in San Francisco, too!

Second, I love Vienna, and not only do I think it’s the most beautiful city in the world, I believe Austria has a lot to offer the world with its illustrious culture, great infrastructure and diversity of talented people. It has great potential to become a center for innovation and already is one for culture.

“I don’t think Austria should try to make Vienna “the next Silicon Valley”. The Silicon Valley is the best Silicon Valley because it is itself.”

width= — (c) foundertalks.org: Impression from a previous event.

So could Vienna become the European or at least the CEE-Silicon Valley?

I don’t think Austria should try to make Vienna “the next Silicon Valley” as many cities are aspiring to be. The Silicon Valley is the best Silicon Valley because it is itself, which includes its unique history, location and inertia which is not duplicable. Rather, I think Austria’s impact will be stronger by identifying its natural, unique strengths, and taking into account what levers it can effectively pull to optimize for a fecund environment of innovation and industry that might look very different from what Silicon Valley is today, but be just as powerful in its own way.

As Andi (Klinger) said, a big impediment for startups in Europe is that it is difficult to scale outside of one’s own country as there is a lot of overhead to expanding country by country with different languages, laws, and geographies. I agree with Andi that making it easier for startups to scale and work at a European level will be beneficial, especially for founders with B2C business models for whom scaling by people is important.

Also, I see that aside from traditional B2C and B2B business models, there is a lot of opportunity now for earlier tech heavy development that are more culturally agnostic. For example, self-driving cars, artificial intelligence, machine learning, AR/VR, in addition to the supporting hardware (like GPUs and Lidars).

I can’t speak to the ins-and-outs of growing a startup from scratch since I’ve not founded one myself — my expertise and what I enjoy doing is in cross-cultural community growth and development, scaling, business analysis and event planning from my experience with Google, the United Nations, YCombinator and Cruise Automation.

To those points, Austria not only has great universities and resources for research and development, Vienna is uniquely a geographical nexus point between Western and Eastern Europe. Also, over 70 percent of the country speaks English, so there is a higher probability that there will be a denominating language between all the best people around the world to work together. This means that there are fewer barriers to both having experts in tech heavy ventures from all over the world come together in Austria, and for Austrian based companies to scale globally (since English is currently the lingua franca).

When did you first meet Michael and Andreas and why did you decide to do FounderTalks.org together?

I think I originally got connected to Andi from a mutual acquaintance because we each wanted to learn from the other more about the Austrian and SV startup ecosystem. As for Michi, I got a hold of his number somehow and cold-called him to ask for free food from Ströck-Brot for a FounderTalks.org pilot event to keep costs down. He said no for that event, but now if you come to FounderTalks.org events, you get delicious Ströck food! I immediately liked Andi and Michi when I first met them. I think it was mutual? (laughs) And we quickly became friends and have now been for five years. We also had a shared belief in the importance of building a community for our vision of an ideal startup ecosystem, so when I proposed the initial idea of FounderTalks.org they helped to refine the concept with their expertise and insights. And then we just started organizing it. I don’t think we realized going into it how much work it would be. We joke now that FounderTalks.org started as a very expensive and time-consuming hobby.

After the first years of FounderTalks.org: What were your biggest learnings so far? Did you change your approach or your philosophy since the beginning?

FounderTalks.org is organized in three parts: Talks/Q&A, Small Group Mentor Sessions and Social Reception. The Talks/Q&A are off-the-record to enable candidness and insights not usually shared in highly publicized events. For the Mentor Sessions, our speakers break out into small groups with the attendees in ratios of 1:10 to talk more in-depth about the individual’s needs. And so folks can get to know each other personally. We pair attendees with the mentor who seems most suited or has aligned knowledge for what they’re working on. At the Reception, all our Speakers/Mentors are out and about eating and drinking with the attendees, so everyone can have the opportunity to connect with all speakers even if they weren’t paired with them as mentors. It’s also a great setting and for all our invited guests to connect with each other. We limit the number of invited guests to 70-100 in order to maintain low ratios for Mentor Sessions and to promote community building at the Social Receptions.

We got so much positive feedback after the first event about how valuable and special the Mentor Sessions were that we doubled the number of Mentor Sessions in the last two events. Now for our 4th event, we will host two break-out groups so attendees meet with two different Speaker and Mentors at the event. Attendees also expressed that they gained a lot of value from the unique content of the talks, which I think is due to the speakers knowing what they say is off-the-record, and because they are speaking to an invite-only audience so we will continue to keep the events small and well curated.

+++ Edward Kim von Gusto im Interview: “Scheitern war nicht erlaubt” +++

What are your future plans?

I think we’ve created something really special and powerful. A lot of that potency comes from the curation and small, private nature of the event. So the core FounderTalks.org event will remain founder-focused, off-the-record, and invite-only small batches in Austria.

I also see potential to impact the ecosystem and aid innovation by building more integration between founders, investors, corporations and government agencies both across Europe and the US. I plan to grow the program to liaise between and be optimized for what each of these pieces of the ecosystem needs. I’m not sure yet what the most impactful form or arrangement will be, but it could be in the form of spin-off corporate and government events, and hopefully events in the Silicon Valley forAustrian-based companies an organizations. Right now I’m taking time to meet with these different players to learn more about them and am thinking about how we can best build a stronger community together. Basically though, I believe helping to make experts from different worlds curious about and respect each other, then allowing a safe space for them to talk and get to know each other is a winning formula for innovation and creation.

Recently there were more and more comments predicting the end of the startup era (at least in Silicon Valley). What is your opinion on that?

The people saying those things are probably not going to be the ones creating the next big startups.

⇒ Apply for the event here

Kaum ein Tool steht so sehr für den KI-Bauboom wie Lovable. Erst im August 2026 hat das schwedische Startup, wie brutkasten berichtete, eine Series-C-Runde über 400 Millionen US-Dollar abgeschlossen, angeführt von Menlo Ventures und mit dem EQT-gemanagten Scaleup Europe Fund als Co-Lead, bei einer Bewertung von 13,3 Milliarden US-Dollar.

Für Gründer und CEO Anton Osika ist das mehr als eine Finanzierungsrunde: Es sei ein Indikator dafür, dass KI-gestützte No-Code- und Low-Code-Plattformen die Nische verlassen hätten und im Mainstream angekommen seien.

Weg vom Entwickler-Monopol

Auf der Dreamforce in San Francisco erläutert Osika die zentrale These hinter Lovable: „Menschen mit Fachwissen über das jeweilige Problem sollten diejenigen sein, die Software bauen“, so Osika. Wer ein Problem am besten kenne, solle auch die Lösung bauen, egal ob in Marketing, HR, Finance oder Operations. Nicht die formale Qualifikation zähle, sondern die Nähe zum Problem.

Dass Lovable längst kein reines Anfänger-Werkzeug sei, belegt Osika mit einer internen Zahl: 55 Prozent der Lovable-Nutzer:innen brächten mehr als elf Jahre Berufserfahrung in ihrem Fachgebiet mit. Entscheidend sei laut dem Co-Founder nicht das klassische Programmieren, sondern die Fähigkeit, komplexe, unstrukturierte Probleme systematisch in funktionierende Systeme zu zerlegen.

Vom Nebenprojekt zur Unternehmenslösung

Besonders aufschlussreich sind die Praxisbeispiele, die Osika im Gespräch anführt. Bei einer Healthcare-Staffing-Firma habe ein Fachbereichsleiter eine komplette neue Produktlinie für die Zertifizierung von Pflegekräften aufgebaut, samt Verwaltung und Terminplanung, und anschließend mehr als zehn weitere interne Anwendungen vernetzt. In den nordischen McDonald’s-Filialen laufe mittlerweile ein auf Lovable gebautes Interface, über das rund 300 Standorte operative Anfragen abwickeln würden.

Solche Geschichten seien laut Osika keine Ausnahme: Bei knapp zwei Dritteln der Fortune-500-Unternehmen, darunter Adidas und Nvidia, würden Mitarbeitende die Plattform nutzen. Häufig beginne es als kleines Team-Projekt und wachse zur unternehmensweiten Lösung heran.

Entwicklung unter Aufsicht

Damit das nicht in unkontrollierter Schatten-IT ende, setzt Lovable laut Unternehmensangaben auf Admin- und Audit-Funktionen, mit denen IT-Verantwortliche nachvollziehen können sollen, welche Anwendungen entstehen, wo sensible Daten verarbeitet werden und wo Sicherheitslücken drohen. Genau das mache aus der anfänglichen Skepsis von IT-Abteilungen häufig Zustimmung, so Osika: „Es wird vom letzten Nein zu dem, was man ausrollen wollte, zum ersten Ja. So verhindern wir Schatten-IT und die Zersplitterung in unzählige Tools, die niemand mehr überblickt“, erklärt Osika.

Überflüssig würden Engineers durch die Lovable-Nutzung anderer trotzdem nicht, meint Osika: Ihre Rolle verschiebe sich von Routineaufgaben hin zu Architektur, Systemanbindung und der Betreuung unternehmenskritischen Codes.

Warum heißt Lovable eigentlich Lovable?

Zum Schluss des Gesprächs räumt Osika mit einem gängigen Klischee über den europäischen Tech-Standort auf: „Viele halten Europa für langsam, aber wenn man in die Tech-Hubs Europas geht, brodelt es dort wie nie zuvor“, sagt Osika. Dass der Produktfokus so stark auf dem Nutzererlebnis liege, führt Osika auch auf den Standort Stockholm zurück, wo der Großteil des Engineering-Teams sitzt. Man habe in den nordischen Ländern genaue Vorstellungen davon, wie ein Produkt funktionieren solle – oder eben nicht. Diese „I-Tüpfelchen-Reiterei“ mache Lovable erst zu dem was es heute ist.

Warum das Unternehmen ausgerechnet „Lovable“ heißt, erklärt er mit einer letzten Zeile, die zugleich als Leitmotiv des Gesprächs steht: „Software sollte nicht einfach nur funktionieren. Sie soll die Emotionen der Menschen wecken“, so Osika.

Vom Vibe zum Volumengeschäft

Was also vor nicht allzu langer Zeit noch als spielerisches „Vibe-Coding“ belächelt wurde, ist laut Osika längst zu einer Infrastruktur geworden, auf der Enterprisekund:innen die nächsten Prozesssysteme entwickeln. Der Markt für KI-gestütztes Bauen sei, so der Lovable-Gründer, endgültig über das reine Ausprobieren hinausgewachsen – und weit über das Vibecoding hinaus.